The recent launch of the Dodge Charger Daytona EV has sparked controversy, reigniting debates about whether muscle cars and EVs can coexist. While the Daytona EV boasts good looks, respectable performance, and decent tech (albeit somewhat dated), its higher-than-expected price raises questions about its appeal. Dodge, known for its over-the-top, gas-guzzling American performance cars, seems to be attempting a significant pivot. Yet, some might argue that this shift feels more like abandoning the brand’s heritage rather than evolving it.

Mixed Reactions from Reviewers

If you’ve seen Rich Rebuilds’ review, you’ll notice that many journalists weren’t entirely impressed with the Charger Daytona EV. I share their sentiment. My belief that EVs can have “souls” doesn’t quite align with this scenario. Dodge cars have always embodied an attitude—from their aggressive designs to names like Scat Pack, Demon, and Redeye—they’ve symbolized raw, unfiltered power. These cars scream, “This is real, and it’s dangerous.” Unfortunately, the Charger Daytona EV doesn’t seem to capture that same essence. It doesn’t have to either; Dodge should have taken an entirely new approach and naming strategy for their EVs, truly defining what it means to be an American muscle EV. Perhaps names like Pulse Pack, Bloodline, or Dodge Nightstalker could have set the right tone.

A Lackluster Launch

The launch itself felt underwhelming. Rather than showcasing an over-the-top American muscle car with ferocious sound and impractical-yet-thrilling power, the Charger Daytona EV comes across as… practical. It’s a well-rounded car, but is that what Dodge enthusiasts really want? A practical muscle car seems to contradict the very ethos of the brand.

How Could Dodge Have Done Better?

To start, launching both internal combustion engine (ICE) cars and EVs simultaneously could have softened the blow. Imagine this: an updated Challenger alongside the Charger Daytona EV. On one side, you have the classic, over-the-top American muscle car—a machine that metaphorically “could devour bald eagles” with its unapologetic performance. On the other, an EV alternative for those wanting the Dodge badge with a modern twist. However, associating traditional Dodge branding like Scat Pack with the EV lineup should have been reconsidered, as it risks signaling to enthusiasts that Dodge is abandoning its ICE heritage entirely. This dual approach, with distinct branding, might not eliminate complaints from die-hard enthusiasts, but it could create a more balanced reception.

There are rumors that Dodge plans to release an inline-six version of the Charger, but for many, this feels like a letdown. While it might appeal to a broader market, it dilutes the brand’s identity as a creator of unhinged, adrenaline-inducing machines.

The Bigger Picture: EVs and the Next Generation

The demographic for EV buyers is undoubtedly different, though this may shift as newer generations grow up with EVs as the norm. Here at EV Malaya, we believe ICE and EVs can coexist. We lament the current state of EVs, which still fall short of their potential, but we’re equally disheartened by the shift away from over-the-top ICE cars in favor of hybrids or other watered-down technologies.

Final Thoughts

Dodge’s move into the EV space is significant, but the Charger Daytona EV’s launch feels like a missed opportunity. Balancing heritage and innovation is no easy task, but a more strategic approach could have mitigated the backlash. As the automotive world evolves, the challenge for brands like Dodge will be to stay true to their identity while embracing the future.